One of the recent lectuers was on the topic of animation, looking at the relation between commercial and art based. To start we was shown a quote from Norman McLaren stating that; 'Animation is not the art of drawings-that-move, but rather the art of movements that-are-drawn. What happens between each from is much mroe important than what happens on each frame' i believe this to be so true, as the break down drawings decide what kind of characteristics the character has. From this we started to discuss Fantasmagorie, which was thought to be the first animation, we stated this because it was an animation that was entertaining without using a storyline. Looking at this we then went onto Snow white, but not the one you're thinking of, instead the one created by the Fleischer brothers which uses a coheirated narrative and Betty Boop as the main character.
From this Disney was mentioned, i mean how could it not be, when anyone thinks of this topic. Disney is always thought as the number 1 company, with good reason to be as well. Speaking about how dominant it has been over the years and the influences held within, for example, Japenese art. Even though Disney was the dominant company, Warner Brothers quickly became a force to be wreckened with, as they saw a gap in the market and produced animations for a different audience to Disney. The difference between these was tht the lead artist had experience in the cartoon world, where as the lead artist at Warner brothers didnt, which really shows in the stles and the characters. Overall i felt that this lecture was one of the better ones to date.